Love the message, hate the graphic

Meg McLain tells a great story about the relative risk of being killed by terrorists in the US.  Unfortunately, she comes up with this baffling graphic which appears to use the sort of number scales beloved of President Obama’s budget speechwriters:

Sure, there’s a scale problem, when the multipliers range from 6 to 17,600, but generations of scientists and engineers have handled that with a logarithmic scale:

This still doesn’t give the compressed range that MM’s chart shows.  Aha!  Perhaps she’s using the little-known log-log scale (beloved by statisticians who deal with generalized linear models)–let’s see:

Pretty close.  But how would any reasonable person expect a layperson to understand this exotic measurement scale?

Tip from the Knowledge Problem.  And from Thnik Again!

Update (28 September).  In her comments section, Dr Kiesling admonishes me not to “go all Tufte” and tosses out the phrase “mathematically pedant.”    How flattering!  I bet LK was the kind of girl who slugged guys in junior high to get their attention.

3 thoughts on “Love the message, hate the graphic

  1. thanks for sharing! i understand it’s not “mathematically accurate”; however, it’s purpose was to visually convey the idea that people are far too afraid of something that is such a minor threat in comparison to other (what we view to be equally impossible) threats.

  2. Wow! This could be one particular of the most useful blogs We’ve ever arrive across on this subject. Basically Wonderful. I’m also a specialist in this topic so I can understand your hard work. gedaddgdkfec

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: