San Antonio City Council steps on a rake…

…and is surprised when it hits them in the face.  And the ass.

Our lefty, virtue-signaling city council has decided to pick a fight on Chik-fil-A, one of America’s most successful fast-food companies. This doesn’t look like too smart a move, even for nanny-staters. Clearly this is viewpoint discrimination by a government entity, and puts the City in an indefensible situation, especially considering the recent Riley’s American Heritage Farm v. Claremont Unified School District decision coming from Judge Jesus Bernal of the Central District out in California.

Terminating this benefit is a matter of discretion reserved to the District and its agents; however, Defendants’ cannot terminate the benefit for unconstitutional, retaliatory reasons. Because Plaintiffs plausibly allege the cancelled field trips and prohibition of field trips were in retaliation for Riley’s online political commentary, Plaintiffs state a claim for First Amendment retaliation.

Of course, what really gripes me is that (1) Chik-fil-A should sue the pants off the City of San Antonio and the members of the City Council who voted in the ordinance, but (2) should Chik-fil-A win such a lawsuit, it would be city, not Ron Niremberg and his band of stooges, who would pay. Meaning ME, and my fellow city taxpayers.

Look at the lineup:

In this corner, Chik-fil-A

  • Over 2200 locations in the US, Canada, and (!) South Africa
  • Over $9 billion in annual revenue
  • Over 40,000 employees

And, in the opposite corner, the City of San Antonio

  • one location, ostensibly in Texas, USA. But looking more like Massachusetts or California, one of those moonbat places.
  • $2.8 billion budget for 2019
  • Over 11,000 employees

Update:  I’m not the only one who thinks this is a bad idea.  (two guys stuff here)

 

 

Advertisements

Hey, Hey, Hey! My school made the top 20!

UTSA does it again!  My school was recently reported as being #19 of 20 in sugar babies.

SugarBabies
No, not that kind.

And the term sugar baby indicates a young adult willing to become a compensated protege of an older patron in exchange for unspecified (but easily imagined) personal services.

SugarBabe
This kind.

Somehow I suspect this new ranking for UTSA will not appear in any of the school’s recruitment or outreach materials.

Amazon gets pushed back

Writing in The New Geography, Joel Kotkin gets close to one of the threats of commercial cyberfascism:  Amazon’s grab at oligarchic power by siting a new headquarters.  New York’s brush-off to Amazon was the right move, even if for a variety of wrong reasons.  Like constructing sports stadiums with taxpayer money, the exploitation of the public for private gain is a fundamentally immoral practice.

Hot Girl Privilege

Thales at The Declination tells it like it is:

When a hot girl says something stupid, people pay attention to her anyway.

This has the effect of separating the hot chick from reality even more. She might think her stupid poems are beautiful art, because thirsty men will say anything to an attractive woman.

StopOppressingMe

Hot Girl Privilege would be a lot more tolerable if it wasn’t so frequently associated with RBF.

Tip from Sara Hoyt at the Instapundit. (She gets a good quote in the article.)

Trash, White Trash, and REAL Trash

Writing in Oxford American, Chris Offutt’s Trash Food almost gets it right:

My thoughts and feelings were completely irrational. I knew they made no sense. Most of what I owned had belonged to someone else—cars, clothes, shoes, furniture, dishware, cookbooks. I liked old and battered things. They reminded me of myself, still capable and functioning despite the wear and tear.

and

Nevertheless I’d felt compelled to mislead him [my Oxford friend] based on class stigma. I was ashamed—of my fifteen-year-old Mazda, my income, and my rented home. I felt ashamed of the very clothes I was wearing, the shoes on my feet. Abruptly, with the force of being struck in the face, I understood it wasn’t his judgment I feared. It was my own.

The road to getting over this is simple:  stop worrying about what other folks think and trust your own judgement.  Only a fool yuppie pays full price for goods that rapidly depreciate.  Tricks like eschewing $75 shirts and shopping at the resale store, the day-old bread store, and the discount market where no English is spoken have netted me enough cash to buy a gently-used BMW Z4.  OUTRIGHT. That car is now 12 years old, squeaky clean, well-maintained, and payment-free.

Offutt worries about the kind of folks labeled “white trash”

The term “white trash” is an epithet of bigotry that equates human worth with garbage. It implies a dismissal of the group as stupid, violent, lazy, and untrustworthy—the same negative descriptors of racial minorities, of anyone outside of the mainstream. At every stage of American history, various groups of people have endured such personal attacks. Language is used as a weapon: divisive, cruel, enciphered. Today is no different.

BUT, he needs to remember that there are plenty of folks who we white trash label as real trash: stupid, violent, lazy, and untrustworthy for starters,, But also whining, wheedling drug-addled grifters.  By their unkempt surroundings, undisciplined pets, garish grooming, tats, cigarettes, and pawnshop jewelry you will know them.

The sin of the white elites is their failure to make distinctions.  The racial stereotyping they so decry is exactly what they apply to working class whites.  Offutt, to his credit, knows how to deal with these smartasses:

When strangers thought I was stupid because of where I grew up, I understood that they were granting me the high ground. I learned to patiently wait in ambush for the chance to utterly demolish them intellectually. Later I realized that this particular battle strategy was a waste of energy. It was easier to simply stop talking to that person—forever.

Trash Food is good food for thought, go read the whole thing.

Tip from Vanderleun at American Digest, where he dishes some real pearls.

Maybe NOT every job will be automated

Turns out there may be an upper limit to automating retail businesses.  When confronted with self-serve checkouts, many folks turn into thieves:

“There is NO MORAL ISSUE with stealing from a store that forces you to use self checkout, period. THEY ARE CHARGING YOU TO WORK AT THEIR STORE.”

It’s so pervasive that it’s not even called shoplifting any more; it’s “external shrinkage.”

TheBananaTrick

This is going to continue until retailers wise up to the idea that it’s cheaper to have a flesh-and-blood cashier ringing up–and collecting payment for–purchases, than it is to have the stuff just walk out the door.

Tip from the Geek Press.